Meta's real antitrust problems are only beginning
Why an FTC inquiry into the company's VR ambitions matters more than today's lawsuit ruling
Just over 13 months ago, the Trump-era Federal Trade Commission sought to break up Facebook. The lawsuit was a long time in coming — it sought to unwind acquisitions that were made in 2012 (Instagram) and 2014 (WhatsApp) — and, in its initial form, was laughed out of court. The FTC had not plausibly demonstrated that Facebook had a monopoly, Judge James E. Boasberg ruled at the time, and thus could not proceed.
Still, Boasberg offered the FTC a second chance: re-file the case with more evidence to support its central claim, and perhaps it could go to trial. In the intervening months, President Trump had been dislodged from office, and antitrust crusader Lina Khan took the reins at the FTC. To no one’s surprise, she took Boasberg up on the offer to file a revised case. And in a ruling issued today, Boasberg ruled that the case can proceed.
Here’s Cat Zakrzewski at the Washington Post:
The revised complaint included enough facts to “plausibly establish” that Facebook has a monopoly in personal social networking, referring to services that allow people to maintain relationships with family and friends online, Boasberg said. Boasberg said the “Achilles’ heel” of the FTC’s first complaint was that it was devoid of data supporting its claim that “no other social network of comprable scale exists in the United States.” But the revised complaint included data from the analytics firm ComScore, and argued that Facebook’s share of daily active users of apps providing personal social networking in the United States has exceeded 70 percent since 2016.
“In short, the FTC has done its homework this time around,” Boasberg wrote.
The homework, incidentally, was not particularly elaborate: this time the FTC simply included some Comscore data about the time people spend using Facebook products, along with numbers of daily and monthly active users for it and other products in the space. It remains noteworthy, if unsurprising, that the Trump FTC could not manage to clear even that low bar.
In any event, today the New York Times said Boasberg had handed the FTC “a major victory in its quest to curtail the power of the biggest tech companies.” At the very least, the judge helped the FTC save face: after more than five years of lawmakers and regulators decrying the size and influence of Facebook, it would have been beyond embarrassing for the agency to fail even to bring its case to trial.
And yet, as I wrote here when the case was filed, each passing year has weakened the FTC’s monopoly case, and the agency spent all of 2021 struggling to keep it viable. While the agency flailed, TikTok was born and reached enormous scope — in 2021, it was the most visited website in the world, according to Cloudflare. The government would argue that TikTok is fundamentally different than Facebook, alleging that the latter holds a monopoly in something called “personal social networking services.” And yet anyone can open up Facebook or Instagram and notice, day by day, how they are gradually assuming more and more features of TikTok, the app it is supposedly so distinct from.
Meanwhile, Facebook is now Meta, and “a metaverse company.” Questions about whether it’s possible to compete with Instagram or WhatsApp feel feel like questions of more interest to historians than to the next generation of entrepreneurs, which are contentedly (and perhaps foolishly) now rebuilding the entire internet — social networks included — on the blockchain.
One of the oldest arguments against breaking Facebook up was that the market would eventually end the company’s dominance anyway, and likely much faster than any lawsuit could. There’s no doubt that Facebook is still dominant in social networking. But there are cracks in its armor.
All of which makes it notable that while Boasberg allowed the case to proceed, he wrote that “the agency may well face a tall task down the road in proving its allegations.” Over and over again in the 48-page complaint, he notes that he is not yet allowed to assess the accuracy of the facts presented in the FTC’s case. Instead, his job is to determine whether the facts, if true, make for plausible allegations of wrongdoing. And at this point, he decides, they do.
(He stood fast in rejecting another part of the lawsuit case, which argued that Facebook had illegally restricted the transfer of data to third-party developers. That particular policy ended in 2013, making any wrongdoing feel like old news even by the standards of this case.)
Don’t get me wrong: I believe Facebook did make social networks less competitive when it acquired Instagram and WhatsApp. And we’ll never know what consumer benefits we might have seen had those companies remained independent.
But 2014 was a long time ago. And the coming lawsuit and inevitable appeals will stretch out for many more years. At this point, even if the government does successfully force a spinout of Instagram and WhatsApp, those companies will be reborn into a world that is moving on.
The good news for consumers, and for competition, is that the FTC is moving on, too. Even if this lawsuit fails in the end, by filing it the agency has signaled that it will intensely scrutinize any future efforts by Meta to acquire other social networking products. And as new social networks rise up in the future, the lessons learned from Instagram and WhatsApp will almost certainly inspire much more rigorous reviews of future acquisitions in the space. (It’s already happening: in November the United Kingdom blocked Meta from buying a GIF search engine.)
Even better, from my perspective, is that the FTC has begun to train its attention where it actually belongs: on Meta’s efforts to snap up all the biggest studios and talent in virtual reality and augmented reality. When I wrote about that subject last June, Meta had already acquired Big Box VR, Unit 2 Games, Beat Games, Sanzaru Games, and Ready at Dawn. Then, in October, it made one of its biggest purchases in the space to date: the Los Angeles VR company Within, makers of the breakout hit subscription fitness app Supernatural, for a reported $400 million.
Meta owns the Oculus App Store, and has perfect knowledge about which games are selling well and converting Quest owners into daily users. In that sense, it’s the company’s sequel to Onavo, the app that once provided vital early warnings about upstart competitors. In 2022, what Meta wants to buy in VR is far more important to the future than what Facebook bought a decade ago.
That’s why I was heartened to see The Information report last month that the FTC has opened a formal inquiry into Meta’s acquisition of Within:
Meta’s first five VR app acquisitions went through without a hitch because they were too small to trigger a cursory review by U.S. antitrust regulators. But those regulators are slowing down the $400 million-plus Supernatural deal, according to two people with knowledge of the situation. Shortly after Thanksgiving, the Federal Trade Commission opened an in-depth probe of the acquisition, meaning Meta may not be able to finalize the acquisition for another year, assuming the agency doesn’t formally challenge the deal in court, causing additional delays.
This is where the FTC’s attention actually belongs: not on the distant past, but on the still-up-for-grabs present, in which Meta pumps its profits into selling the Quest 2 below cost — to great success this holiday season — and in acquiring all the most-used software in the space.
What happens to Instagram and WhatsApp still matters a lot. But what happens on next-generation platforms may matter much more. The bad news is that the FTC’s current lawsuit came too late to make a difference. The good news is that it seems determined not to make the same mistake twice.
Today’s featured jobs on the Platformer Jobs board include:
Outreach & Engagement Manager, Digital Trust & Safety Partnership.
Project Lead, Global Coalition For Digital Safety, World Economic Forum.
Some posts here are paid. For more great jobs in tech policy and trust and safety, or to create a listing, visit here. Nonprofits and academic institutions can post for free using the code NONPROFIT.
⭐ Former President Trump’s forthcoming social network, Truth Social, appears to be many months away from launch. A Trump project beset by chaos? You don’t say. Here are Douglas MacMillan, Josh Dawsey and Elizabeth Dwoskin at the Washington Post:
The effort so far has been plagued with problems and delays. Dozens of engineers, cybersecurity specialists and other technical experts are needed to build a social media platform, and though Trump Media has said some hiring has taken place, it will be slow until it completes a planned merger with a publicly traded company.
That merger is under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Digital World Acquisition, which has raised $1.2 billion to acquire Trump Media, said last month that the SEC is examining its communications with Trump Media for potential violations of securities rules. One Trump adviser said regulators have caused the lawyers involved with Trump’s new media ventures to be particularly cautious.
A look at Google’s efforts to influence the final draft of the European Union’s Digital Markets Act. Lawmakers and policy advisers say they have been inundated with claims that the proposed rules will hurt small businesses. (Javier Espinoza / Financial Times)
A judge ruled that Google must turn over more documents in a labor case. “In one document that the judge said did not pass muster for confidentiality, a Google lawyer explained that the company wanted consulting help … ‘to engage employees more positively and convince them that unions suck.’” (Daisuke Wakabayashi / New York Times)
An analysis of tweets about the conflict in Ethiopia found that Twitter suspending its trending topics feature in the country did not reduce the volume of tweets or the prevalence of threatening speech. (Megan A. Brown / Tech Policy Press)
Last year saw a record number of cyber attacks, led by the log4j vulnerability. Recorded attacks were up 50 percent per week, according to cybersecurity firm Check Point. (Jonathan Greig / ZDNet)
OpenSea is struggling to police stolen art on the platform. NFT trading platforms generally do not make artists verify ownership of a work before they list it for sale, making them havens for thieves. (Kevin Collier / NBC)
China is accelerating its efforts to ban deepfakes. Regulators now ban apps like TikTok cousin Douyin from promoting “synthetic” content, though in practice the rule may be impossible to enforce. (Vittoria Elliott and Meaghan Tobin / Rest of World)
⭐ A Google executive said Apple is “holding back” customers who text. Hiroshi Lockheimer wants Apple to support the messaging standard RCS. Here’s Sean Hollister at The Verge:
On Saturday, Android boss Hiroshi Lockheimer accused Apple of “using peer pressure and bullying as a way to sell products,” after a Wall Street Journal report revealed how US teens have turned Apple’s iMessage into a social status symbol that locks Android users out.
Now, Lockheimer is taking a slightly less abrasive stance: the Google executive said Monday that “we’re not asking Apple to make iMessage available on Android. We’re asking Apple to support the industry standard for modern messaging (RCS) in iMessage, just as they support the older SMS / MMS standards.”
DoorDash CEO Tony Xu joined the Meta board. He will be responsible for bringing takeout to every board meeting. (Meta)
The Associated Press opened a marketplace for NFTs of its photojournalism. Proceeds will support the organization’s journalism. (Mitchell Clark / The Verge)
Snap acquired display company Compound Photonics. The company “is notable for its work on liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) displays, one of a few display technologies that could plausibly work its way into more AR glasses within the next few years.” (Mathew Olson / The Information)
Meta delayed its return to office plans by another two months and said it would require vaccine booster shots. What are the odds this new March 28 date holds? (Kif Leswing / NBC)
Twitch banned popular streamer Disguised Toast after he streamed an anime, breaking copyright rules. Streamers are increasingly posting and reacting to copyrighted video, posing enforcement challenges for the Amazon-owned company. (Austen Goslin / Polygon)
Those good tweets
Talk to me
Send me tips, comments, questions, and Meta acquisitions: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Isn't the fact that Tiktok succeeded due to being Chinese (i.e. beyond the reach of Fb) reason enough to show how the market suffered from the purchase of IG and Whatsapp? Same with VK? Although it was a while ago the repercussions are still with us and worth pursuing, no?